Medical technology helps to live long life. Is that curse or blessing for society and mankind?

The consequences of advancements of technology in the medical field have always been an unsettled topic among personage. There are numerous adverse effects of increased life expectancy due to medical technology on society. This essay will succinctly present various disadvantages of medical technology.
To begin with, with the increase in medical technology the human population is increasing and is adversely affecting the environment. Due to myriad new technologies in medical sciences, the life expectancy has elevated, and the pressure on earth has surged. In a recent case study, for example, scientists found that the primary cause of global warming is due to increasing population. Thus, these disadvantages put medical technology in lousy stead as far as environmental benefits are concerned.
Furthermore, prolong life expectancy has several ill-effects on the economic growth. With the increasing population due to the advancement s in medical technology, the demand of age care services is increasing, and putting abundant pressure on the economy of any country especially the developing nations. For instance, countries like China and India are facing critical problems related to the overgrowing population. Hence, it is apparent why many are against the advancements in medical technology.
This essay discussed the various demerits of medical progress such as environmental and economic effects. Given the arguments outlined and elucidated above, the demerits of medical technology are too conspicuous to ignore.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, so, thus, for example, for instance, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 20.9802955665 24% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 226.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78761061947 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19299835079 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 139.433497537 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58407079646 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2222115491 50.4703680194 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.615384615 104.977214359 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3846153846 20.9669160288 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205539264717 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790930516501 0.0925447433944 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406167900187 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131730014469 0.151781067708 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382154014822 0.0609392437508 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 12.6369458128 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.84 53.1260098522 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.