Medical technology helps to live long life. Is that curse or blessing for society and mankind?
Recently, the phenomenon of the effects of utilizing new and modern technology in order to treat patients on having a longer life than before and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although this issue is beneficial as it regarded by the substantial number of individuals both constructive and positive, others hold opponents views. I am inclined to believe that it can be plus as it could develop brillian aspects for its adherents.
From a social standpoint, the influence of medical technology on the period of life is vital and has some crucial advantages. These benefits are rooted in the fact of the human tendency for living long. From my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered thses effects. The tendency for living long is based on some paramount factors. firstly, people always like to be with their families, relatives and friends. Secondly, populations always have strong fear of death and try to protect themselves to not face it. Furthermore, an array of dwellers would like to be alive in order to compensate their past including boosting some conditions or addressing some confrontations.
On the one hand, the idea of having a long time life by using technology and the other modern health features has some opponents. They argued that by occuring this subject the number of elderly people have increased. Hence, we have an old society with no exciting and interesting events.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of having a long life by considering modern health technological systems are far more outweigh its drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Firstly
...ong is based on some paramount factors. firstly, people always like to be with their fa...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19202898551 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9444798637 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623188405797 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.056468466 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.357142857 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.25397266985 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196727221852 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066284112193 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704581135994 0.071462118173 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108858338003 0.151781067708 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294068108842 0.0609392437508 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.