Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. to what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the modern world, human life expectancy has improved by a significant involvement of technology. Medical science has seen a tremendous amount of development in last decades. Many people believe technology is accountable for it, but opponents think otherwise. In my opinion, medical science is certainly regarded for the betterment of people's life expectancy. This essay will illustrate various arguments highlighting the subject matter.
Firstly, with the advent of technology, various affordable medicines, medical-equipments and medical procedures are available in every nook and corner of the city. Continuous technological development programs have resolved plenty of uncurable health ailments. Furthermore, the public is aware of health hazards, so spend time on physical exercises and read health-related magazines daily. For instance, Tuberculosis was uncurable in 1990, but with constant efforts of government and the latest medical technology, it has become curable.
In contrast, the increased mortality rate has numerous negative aspects as well. A significant amount of people are old age and require a tremendous amount of resources and money for upkeep. Thus, impacting the economy of the country and communities, families are treating them as a financial burden. However, they can be used as a mentor to the young generation and earn a livelihood.
To recapitulate, the advantages of improved life expectancy outweigh its demerits. Hence, it is safe to assert that medical science has played a pivotal role in improving the living conditions of humans and have expanded the life expectancy.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, well, for instance, in contrast, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 20.9802955665 38% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1247.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 220.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66818181818 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22360547081 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 139.433497537 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627272727273 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7225322844 50.4703680194 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0714285714 104.977214359 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7142857143 20.9669160288 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.25397266985 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185581441086 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553232785543 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610114439195 0.071462118173 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11037768097 0.151781067708 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682901125951 0.0609392437508 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 53.1260098522 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.31 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.