Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The importance about human's life expectancy has become more controversial in the last few years. In this essay, I shall discuss factors in strengthening my argument while analysing the both sides to explain my opinion. my point of view is clear and medical technology could be a factor but not the only responsible.
Firstly, many changes around the world, like technology, food, jobs and sports are playing an important factor about human's life expectancy. In australia and many countries some people can to find solutions for health problems, for example, if someone need to make a brain exam, in any clinic can do it, but if someone in Colombia or Venezuela wants to do the same, if probably that the hospital does not have all the equipments or the technology for do it. so, the human's life expectancy in australia is higher than colombia, and we can say because australia has more medical technology.
On the other hand, australia is as well one of the first countries with obese people and where people died for heart attack, so medical technology in my opinion is not just important to have a hight human;s life expectancy. However, is important to understand that parents and families need to teach our children how to care themselves, because, its does not matter if the country has a lot medical technology but if their people do not want to eat healthy, their life expectancy going down.
In conclusion, the impact about think if medical technology is responsible about human's life expectancy always will be debatable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 220, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: My
...g the both sides to explain my opinion. my point of view is clear and medical tech...
^^
Line 3, column 467, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...ts or the technology for do it. so, the humans life expectancy in australia is higher ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 32, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...down. In conclusion, the impact about think if medical technology is responsib...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, so, then, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1280.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94208494208 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7383909602 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57528957529 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.5024630542 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.2577464123 50.4703680194 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.222222222 104.977214359 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7777777778 20.9669160288 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 7.25397266985 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273566154021 0.242375264174 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112220229597 0.0925447433944 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536593285274 0.071462118173 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169562315865 0.151781067708 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469620323265 0.0609392437508 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.1260098522 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.32886699507 95% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 55.0591133005 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.3980295567 127% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.