Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The importance of medical technology which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it beneficial while others reject of this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my view for favoring both side positive and negative effects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most important one stems for facts of this trend is that advancement in medical science has resulted in upgrading the life expectancy of an individual. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that earlier people used to die early in the influence of deadly diseases, but medical technology has changed the scenario. Nowadays, there are several vaccines generated which can cure chronic as well as non chronic diseases. Needless to say, that all these merits stand in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but the most alarming one is that some medicines are not good for our health because they have negative reaction on our health. Hence, it is apparent why are many in against of this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach a conclusion that the benefits of medical technology are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rly in the influence of deadly diseases, but medical technology has changed the s...
^^
Line 5, column 292, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun in seems to be countable; consider using: 'many ins'.
Suggestion: many ins
...r health. Hence, it is apparent why are many in against of this trend. According to ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, thus, well, while, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26356589147 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74203919001 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581395348837 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.1575209933 50.4703680194 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.166666667 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.25397266985 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0826278192748 0.242375264174 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0290964454591 0.0925447433944 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338573252331 0.071462118173 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0536514898633 0.151781067708 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235674105525 0.0609392437508 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.