Medical technology is responsible for the longevity of human life. Is it a curse or a blessing? To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Medical technology has grown so rigorous that it has increased the life of people. Though, some people say that it has resulted in a catastrophe whereas others contend that it has benefited the society as a whole. But, in my perception, medical advancements have resulted in augmenting quality of life by making cure for many ailments even with a slight disadvantage.
Undoubtedly, enhancements in medical sciences have lead the mankind towards health as nowadays cure has been found even for some fatal diseases such as cancer, lung-disorder, hearing impairment and blindness etcetera. Not only, it has made people more confident and competent but also has improved the vitality of a person's life as elders are living longer, thus they can impart moral values to their children. Moreover, for instance, established cricketer Yuvraj Singh survived while being on the death bed as he was suffering from cancer just because of latest technology in medical science.
However, on the contrary, there is an exception as medical technology has also resulted in making countries overpopulated due to the less fatality rate and more mortality rate. Numerous countries are facing this problem which further aggravates the situation due to the upliftment in the number old workers at workplaces and also it creates a problem for some families as it creates extra burden on them rarely.
In conclusion, technological advancements in medical have proved advantageous for the society. Not to forget, older people are the main essence and pillars of a family and in the absence of them, the relationship bond amid members of the family may falter or diminish. Eventually, advancements in medical are a blessing in disguise.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 316, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...but also has improved the vitality of a persons life as elders are living longer, thus ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 554, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the latest'.
Suggestion: of the latest
... was suffering from cancer just because of latest technology in medical science. Howeve...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'rarely' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...lies as it creates extra burden on them rarely. In conclusion, technological advance...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25912408759 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94010439666 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613138686131 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1581143756 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9090909091 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7272727273 7.25397266985 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170132921571 0.242375264174 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730930017743 0.0925447433944 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557361763517 0.071462118173 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102162091376 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295808468811 0.0609392437508 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.