Online information has changed different aspects of human beings' lives, one of which is their attitude toward library books which have been widely debated, especially during the last decade. While some believe that online websites are a negative development, I am not convinced that their advantages are deniable. From my vantage point, beneficial outcomes of the internet comprising an ease in sharing information as well as no physical place requirements are remarkable.
Those who advocate online libraries state that they play a significant role in distributing online information, which contributes to a broad access to first-hand knowledge. As a result, both the publication of E-books and the distribution of online newspapers may be reinforced, and result in more informed individuals influencing diverse facets of the society. Moreover, a wide range of research has been conducted to study the positive impacts of online journals on people's enthusiasms for reading books, and their concrete evidence is remarkable.
Not only do digital libraries have a critical influence on obtaining information, but also the fundamental essence of a digital age emphasizes the significance of digital books. In other words, although a vast number of measures should be considered to monitor and indicate the probable consequences, some vital and crucial notions including hard books and physical libraries cannot be underestimated. Take unreliable data which emerge as a result of online sources for example.
To conclude, while digital information may have a widespread adverse effect on libraries, advantages open up new horizons for changes and progresses not only in sharing a tremendous amount of information but also in storing books, which affects essential parts of society foundations. If so, undergoing a paradigm shift will be inevitable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 134, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'broad access'.
Suggestion: broad access
...nline information, which contributes to a broad access to first-hand knowledge. As a result, b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for example, as a result, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 280.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60714285714 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13520985204 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635714285714 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.4023446937 50.4703680194 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.727272727 104.977214359 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4545454545 20.9669160288 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1818181818 7.25397266985 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189532960944 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680361559831 0.0925447433944 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039251947847 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111280845149 0.151781067708 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366058478661 0.0609392437508 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 12.6369458128 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.68 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.