In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is a good idea or not?
The examination system has been a controversial issue among all academic societies. While many people think the continuous assessment is the only way to gain the exact results, others hold an opponent view and support formal examination. This essay will examine both sides by providing some academic evidence before logical concluding.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why some people support continual assessing. First and foremost, they tend to believe that student’s evaluation plays a pivotal role in their future career and development. Secondly, they use an essential valid logic to say that traditional system could lead to increased anxiety in elementary school student and they could not show their real ability and best output in the constrained exam. According to academic research conducted by Tokyo Medical University, those children below 10 who participated in written exam research, usually faced with confusion and stress more than another classmate who involved in the continual assessment. Furthermore, a single written examination may not cover all their talent and skills in a strict time.
On the other hand, the regular assessment may have some negative aspect and the usual testing system could provide equal opportunity to every student to show their real caliber. In addition, they have the same amount of time and resources, and it could help teachers to filter hard workers eventually. Besides, all examination papers were provided under the supervision of a reliable invigilator on the institute. From my own experience, it could be encouraging when you compared with others.
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that, although some people support the idea of continuous evaluation instead of formal examination, I inclined to believe that traditional system still could be beneficial to show the real grasping power of every student equally and fairly.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, may, second, secondly, so, still, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47118644068 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86890630451 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64406779661 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.8859209462 50.4703680194 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.153846154 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.25397266985 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0911860822766 0.242375264174 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0288089846072 0.0925447433944 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0259179175459 0.071462118173 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0538900551898 0.151781067708 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00458979803628 0.0609392437508 8% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 12.6369458128 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.