Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of spending budget by the government to fine arts and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that some sort of arts such as music and painting could be rewarding for both society and individuals, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of citizens. I profoundly inclined to believe that spreading fine arts, such as music, is a spiritual need for all human beings, and this essay will examine both sides by providing some academic evidence before the conclusion.
On the one hand, from a social standpoint, supporting arts could be beneficial for every aspect of the society by providing a creative atmosphere among all members. Moreover, not only learning some musical instruments, such as piano, could lead to progressively improving the mental health of people, but also could bring some teamwork abilities for youngsters. Not to mention that, according to an academic research conducted by Tehran University, music and painting therapy is one of the most effective ways in the modern mental care system. Furthermore, it could lead to some national and international advancement for participants.
On the other hand, some opponents stand against the government’s investment in music and painting only. They support their arguments by providing some valid logics about another aspect of arts, which need to be supported by authorities as well as painting and music. Besides, due to a survey conducted by Julliard Institute, some sort of arts, especially ancient ones, are on the verge of annihilation and should be founded by serious financial attention from governments in terms of rehabilitating.
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that, although spending so much money on just music and painting could be exaggerating, but I think that these types of arts are the most popular ones.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, moreover, so, well, i think, sort of, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 303.0 242.827586207 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33663366337 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07296705008 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580858085809 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.6753209 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.0 104.977214359 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5454545455 20.9669160288 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.90909090909 7.25397266985 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142448781235 0.242375264174 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575215349685 0.0925447433944 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484097705152 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0883169762054 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725917317573 0.0609392437508 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.1260098522 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.