Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss both side.
Recently; the phenomenon of spending too much time at work and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that keep the balance between work and personal life is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded as both thoroughly constructive and positive by substantial numbers of individuals. I profoundly inclined to believe that being more hours at work than enough could bring many detrimental impacts, and this essay will examine both sides before concluding.
From a social standpoint, having enough time for individual life could bring many benefits for society, which rooted in the fact that job satisfaction and working capacity are extremely bound up. From my own experience when I was a college student, I perform an academic survey which looking for the rate of time spent by workers for their families. Not to mention that a hectic lifestyle could lead to unhealthy conditions for individuals. Thus, the beneficial ramification of both routine work and keep the balance between work and private life apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of economic science, the consequences of casual work are directly related to total income. Some people tend to believe that spending too much time at work could lead to a better life for them and their families. According to an academic research conducted by Tehran University, most of the less-educated people tend to work in a part-time job. Hence, it is true to believe that highly educated labor force could have some positive effects such as happy family and constructive social behavior.
To recapitulate I pen down saying that although some people tend to spend too much time at work to fulfill their needs, I strongly believe that the demerits outweigh its advantages. Of course, governments should increase public awareness in order to increase the social health.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, hence, if, look, so, thus, of course, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 301.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21926910299 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78761893139 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568106312292 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3497149253 50.4703680194 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.846153846 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 7.25397266985 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394255167489 0.242375264174 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133714896431 0.0925447433944 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106888852931 0.071462118173 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235423607279 0.151781067708 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243949175329 0.0609392437508 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.