Recently, the phenomenon of maintaining the correct balance between work and other aspects of life has sparked a heated debate. Although, contested by many but professional people should reserve few hours of the day for their family and other recreational activities, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. The former notion has several elements that deserve attention, and I will explain why using pertained arguments.
There are myriads of arguments supporting the above context, and the most conspicuous one lies in the fact that employees get exhausted with late working hours and even over-time. Thus, beneficial ramifications of sipping a glass of coconut juice at the beach and playing football with siblings apparently can be seen. As a tangible example, according to research undertaken by Stanford University, 9 out of 10 employees who maintained a work-life balance had greater overall performance in their career. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion that peace is achieved through equally dividing time productively.
On the other hand, some opponents disagree with this theory that nowadays, working alone is not enough to keep up to date with the technology pace, but research and development is required. Noticeably, there are people who stay in the office day and night to meet their family needs. This is because the recent recession has caused lay-offs, and companies prefer people who work a plethora of hours.
To conclude, while there are several compelling reasons on both sides, I profoundly believe that to keep your mind fresh and healthy, it is important to ensure there is enough time left for family and fun.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30656934307 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87508788062 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642335766423 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2332796376 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.181818182 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9090909091 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 7.25397266985 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239821070933 0.242375264174 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779446479321 0.0925447433944 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588117622052 0.071462118173 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122154034443 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396788918632 0.0609392437508 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30656934307 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87508788062 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642335766423 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2332796376 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.181818182 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9090909091 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 7.25397266985 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239821070933 0.242375264174 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779446479321 0.0925447433944 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588117622052 0.071462118173 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122154034443 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396788918632 0.0609392437508 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.