Nowadays, the mass media including Tv, radio, and the newspaper have become the essential part of out lives. What is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of the mass media and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of newspaper headlines is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the source of information can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the essential part of lives can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of public awareness, as well as the necessary information, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered media groups. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the television news and the radio station apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, daily newspapers might increase the consequences of the latest information. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the media study could relate to this reality that demerits of the false information pertain to living condition. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of television channels is correlated negatively with the media campaign. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of living better.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the media sources far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the role of media prove the significance of the newspaper information, but also pinpoint television reports implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 264.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51136363636 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.197954663 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4212005191 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.25 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118946619681 0.242375264174 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0378190193868 0.0925447433944 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0239728221026 0.071462118173 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0658920085253 0.151781067708 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00724058741223 0.0609392437508 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.