Recently, the phenomenon of dangerous activities and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the metter of motorcycle competition is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded both constructive and positive by a substantial numebr of individuals. I highly believe that the role of activity in people's life can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint sky diving and motorcycling can provide the society wih noticable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of sporting activities, are cruial. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of working people. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of high risk activities are visible.
From a scientific point of view, motorcycling excitement can provide the community with negative impacts that are related to the reality that demerits of gaming activities are remarkable. As a tangible example, Some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university which described the role of public people. Hence, predicted outcomes of athletic activities are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of people engagement in activities far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of sky diving races prove the significance of enthusiactic people, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 26, Rule ID: SKY_DIVING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'skydiving'?
Suggestion: skydiving
...t this essay. From a social standpoint sky diving and motorcycling can provide the societ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 205, Rule ID: SKY_DIVING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'skydiving'?
Suggestion: skydiving
...rawbacks. Not only do the advantages of sky diving races prove the significance of enthusi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1282.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 226.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67256637168 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25989400442 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646017699115 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0606269017 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.545454545 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153247348998 0.242375264174 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051560109583 0.0925447433944 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.027295675691 0.071462118173 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0865172171456 0.151781067708 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237811921319 0.0609392437508 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.78 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.