Nowadays, television is an essential part of our lives, as a medium to spread news and awareness, and, for some, it even acts as a companion. What is your opinion about this?

Essay topics:

Nowadays, television is an essential part of our lives, as a medium to spread news and awareness, and, for some, it even acts as a companion. What is your opinion about this?

Recently, the phenomenon of watching television and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the significance of complex procedures is highly beneficial such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that awaring of news can be a plus, and I will analyze that throuogout this essay.

From a general standpoint, influenes of television can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that an essential part of our lives, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experinece, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, the benfecial ramifications of both spread news and awareness apparently can be seen.

Within the realm of a public arena, the television outputs might increase the consequences of social activity. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious unoversity has asserted that the downside of creative process is correlated with making a companoin. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benfits of television effects far out weigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantage of social improvment prove total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential of implications.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1320.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 235.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6170212766 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22736152006 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.685106382979 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.940548423 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147423070537 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045124224683 0.0925447433944 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454176498816 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0738882948729 0.151781067708 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550412585431 0.0609392437508 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 12.6369458128 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.99 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.