Nowadays television has become an essential part of life. It is a medium for disseminating news and information, and for some it acts as a companion. What is your opinion about this?
Recently the phenomenon of the involvement of television in our life and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although challenged by many that the matter of being a medium for disseminating news is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that being an essential part of life can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social point of view, being a new medium might increase some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of television programs, as well as the media industry, are inevitably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the relationship between the television role and becoming an unavoidable part of life. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both information distributions and well-balanced life apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, acting as a companion might increase the consequences of fake news. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the information technology could relate to this reality that the demerits of a spoilt companion pertain to media problems. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of well-managed information is correlated negatively with active companions. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of destructive effects.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the necessity of television far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of well-balanced television schedules prove the significance of the news availability, but also pinpoint social media implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...programs, as well as the media industry, are inevitably bound up. According to my...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57243816254 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37130622348 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614840989399 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.27463219 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.416666667 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249200672596 0.242375264174 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717872421738 0.0925447433944 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475428930131 0.071462118173 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126299993711 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569102940582 0.0609392437508 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.3 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.