Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development?
Communication technology has become an integral part of our day-to-day life. This plays a vital role in offering myriad benefits to the users across all over the world, and also it changes the mode of interaction and relationship of human. I completely agree that this phenomenon encourages positive development to the people.
To begin with, there are various reasons why the people's interaction has changed. First and foremost, mobile phones and internet are the important part in communicate people at any time and any part of the world. Furthermore, internet is a boon to people to send e-mails which includes, photos, images, letters, videos and also users can make video call to speak with person. For example, video calls are more likely used in all corporate companies to interact customers and clients.
Adding further, I firmly believe that the mode of communication also affect people's relationship in positive way. Because, parents who live in other country, can interact with their children, and their dear ones through mobile phone video call. Also, this technology encourages the students, professionals, and employees to communicate with their higher ones.
To conclude, communication technologies are boon to the users in the contemporary era which improves the business, studies, economic growth of country in some extent which we cannot be ignored.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 50, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...with, there are various reasons why the peoples interaction has changed. First and fore...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, so, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1171.0 1207.87684729 97% => OK
No of words: 215.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44651162791 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88285808547 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 139.433497537 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627906976744 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 379.143842365 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4438212219 50.4703680194 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.454545455 104.977214359 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5454545455 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237611803655 0.242375264174 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892684807478 0.0925447433944 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628519637059 0.071462118173 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125344194206 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680167508733 0.0609392437508 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.