One of the most pressing problems facing the world today is overpopulation. What policies
do you believe governments should adopt to address the causes and effects of this
problem?
Recently, the phenomenon of global problems and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of natural resources is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that reducing food consumption can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, adopting solutions can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of global warming, as well as climate change, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the effects of population on air pollution. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both governmental policies and national parks apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, overpopulation might increase the consequences of overcrowding. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of nuclear families would relate to this reality that the demerits of using condom pertain to social satisfaction. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of supply and demand is correlated negatively with the population growth rate. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of universal policies.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of international governmental campaigns far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of decrease breeding rate prove the significance of social welfare, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70656370656 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29507669839 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.671814671815 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3419062033 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.166666667 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.048961380655 0.242375264174 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0147508243675 0.0925447433944 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0181984806276 0.071462118173 25% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0262373190694 0.151781067708 17% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.017793287711 0.0609392437508 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.2 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.