Even though globalization affects the world's economies in a positive way, its negative side should not be forgotten.
Recently, the phenomenon of Globalization and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of inventing the internet is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that international companies can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, national economies can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of online systems, as well as social media, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the effects of the internet on globalization. Had it not been for this discovery, I wouldn’t have managed to do so. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the global village and universal relationships apparently can be seen.
On the other hand, within the realm of science, becoming globalized might increase the consequences of personal privacy. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of online hackers would relate to this reality that the demerits of slow online transactions pertain to social problems. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of national communication is correlated negatively with catastrophic events. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of traditional countries.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of international links far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of global development prove the significance of easy worldwide communication, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69202898551 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40018617366 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648550724638 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8500895858 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.846153846 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101375986739 0.242375264174 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.031724175118 0.0925447433944 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0287070846677 0.071462118173 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0562108008546 0.151781067708 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199931750507 0.0609392437508 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.8 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.