Whether experimental learning/practical learning can work well in formal education/traditional teaching, agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of experimental learning and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of formal education is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that practical learning can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, theoretical courses can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of facilitated schools, as well as online courses, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered well-educated teachers. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both academic curriculum and motivated students apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, educational development might increase the consequences of an educational environment. Moreover, fundamental aspects of an old school structure would relate to this reality that the demerits of old-fashion schools pertain to educational growth. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of standard exams is correlated negatively with learning useful skills. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of young teachers.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of traditional teaching far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of modern teaching methods prove the significance of experimental courses, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8373015873 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32512926529 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674603174603 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4278335089 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.583333333 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212717239789 0.242375264174 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633315181814 0.0925447433944 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446428629012 0.071462118173 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108538586664 0.151781067708 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640602712471 0.0609392437508 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.07 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.