Problem and benefits of the high school students study plays and the work of the theatres written centuries ago. Discuss and use your own experience.
Recently, the phenomenon of school challenges and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of traditional writing methods is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that contemporary writers can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay. From a social standpoint, benefits of high school courses can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of modern societies, as well as technological improvement, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the modern literature effects on students' lives. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both role models in theatre and acting in a movie apparently can be seen. Within the realm of science, studying old-fashioned plays might increase the consequences of ancient manuscripts. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of famous writers might relate to this reality that the demerits of boring school activities pertain to students' interest. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of learning traditional writing methods is correlated negatively with cultural heritage. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of human history. To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of modern plays far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the theatres written decades ago prove the significance of developed educational systems, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 271.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64944649446 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23250181118 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653136531365 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3635466953 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.583333333 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.12807881773 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182261186347 0.242375264174 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506224832656 0.0925447433944 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382425735876 0.071462118173 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182261186347 0.151781067708 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0609392437508 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.08 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.