With the development of technology and science, some people believe that there is no great value of artists such as musicians and painters. What are the things artists can do but the scientist cannot? Why should we encourage the art area?
Recently, the phenomenon of technological development and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of developed countries is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that modern art can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, art classes can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of the musical instrument, as well as famous artworks, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of art and technology mixture. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both social satisfaction and modern equipment apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, scientific inventions might increase the consequences of globalization. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of encouraging people would relate to this reality that the demerits of technological advancement pertain to well-equipped galleries. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of old-fashioned societies is correlated negatively with poor arts. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of wrecked devices.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of well-educated artists far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of respecting the art prove the significance of facilitating artistic methods, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79766536965 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43707314679 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665369649805 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6467238549 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.166666667 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200224217862 0.242375264174 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573266424889 0.0925447433944 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0285978188411 0.071462118173 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103442016713 0.151781067708 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0164369070198 0.0609392437508 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.19 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.