How widely do you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life/family/leisure and experience time shortage? What problems will it cause?
Recently, the phenomenon of working time and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of job opportunities is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that hard-working employees can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, personal life experience can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of life expectancy, as well as family satisfaction, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered there should be a balance between work and personal life. Had it not been for this discovery, I wouldn’t have managed to do so. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both close friends and family members attention apparently can be seen.
On the other hand, within the realm of science, family time shortage might increase the consequences of divorce tendency. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of tired workers would relate to this reality that the demerits of dingy offices pertain to an old-fashioned boss. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of family arguments is correlated negatively with uneducated co-workers. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of career improvement.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of moderated working time far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of personal achievements prove the significance of human well-being, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 281.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56227758007 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26969387531 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 139.433497537 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654804270463 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1909819773 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.230769231 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165122270246 0.242375264174 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499568201277 0.0925447433944 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391311865628 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0880253282497 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216555482012 0.0609392437508 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.