In some countries around the world, voting is compulsory. Do you agree with the notion of compulsory voting? If voting is compulsory in a democratic society, what are some conclusions we can draw about the nature of democracy?
Recently, the phenomenon of compulsory voting and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of presidential elections is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that democratic countries can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the nature of democracy can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of political decisions, as well as freedom, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of voting in developed countries. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both social satisfaction and voting system apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the notion of compulsory elections might increase the consequences of young voters. Moreover, fundamental aspects of voting age would relate to this reality that the demerits of voting deprivation pertain to voting right. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of choosing a leader is correlated negatively with the election results. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of old politicians.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of democratic societies far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of democratic elections prove the significance of human rights, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63565891473 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25483558574 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643410852713 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6789981752 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.166666667 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278513592268 0.242375264174 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811485317221 0.0925447433944 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545595112383 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139149437152 0.151781067708 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626991174162 0.0609392437508 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.8 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.