It is irrefutable to say that education of systematic study has burgeoned to become popular. Although this education of
system is regarded as a thoroughly negative point from Einstein's view, I am inclined to highly believe that this system of study is beneficial for students and should be promoted. In this essay, will elucidate the advantages and disadvantages
this education of system.
On the one hand, there are multiple advantages reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that this education of system encourages students and student`s growth. For instance, to measure the effect traditional education on motivation, allow imagination and teamwork. Moreover, a recent scientific research conducted by Yazd University researchers in 2010 has shown that the systematic study leads to social development. Therefore, it is proved that on-campus education can cause to child`s potential.
on the other hand, the predominant of disadvantages reason education of system is students restrict. For example, to understand the relationship between formal education and limited scope of teaching, the result of a study undertaken by Tehran University researchers revealed that distance education is correlated with distraction. Hence, it is obvious that this education would make students hindrance.
To conclude, whilst there are several compelling arguments on both sides, my personal sentiment is that positive
point education of system far outweighs negative point.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...can cause to child's potential. on the other hand, the predominant of di...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
... cause to child's potential. on the other hand, the predominant of disa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 5.75862068966 347% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1328.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 227.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.85022026432 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12876449498 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 139.433497537 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5859030837 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0901852878 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.727272727 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72727272727 7.25397266985 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.12807881773 170% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108838813729 0.242375264174 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0457670054513 0.0925447433944 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.022437130852 0.071462118173 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0638361004004 0.151781067708 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226853333811 0.0609392437508 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.65 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.