Parents are responsible for the behavior of the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Recently, the phenomenon the responsibility of parents for their children behavior and its corresponding aspect has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of parental accountability is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the role of parents for upbringing children can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the responsibility of parents to shape the kid’s character can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that providing the education, as well as developing the social skills, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of responsibility of parents on emotional aspects of children. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both social behavior and promoting the self-confidence apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of providing a secure atmosphere by parents, parents’ responsibility for upbringing children might increase the consequences of imitating parents’ actions. Moreover, fundamental aspects of misbehavior of kids would relate to this reality that the demerits of physical punishment pertain to violent behavior. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of distraction among children is correlated negatively with committing a crime. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of promoting the intellectual ability of children.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of parental accountability outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of creative children prove the significance of safe atmosphere at home, but also pinpoint social implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1714.0 1207.87684729 142% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8698630137 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47926328902 2.71678728327 128% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606164383562 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 379.143842365 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4722133475 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.833333333 104.977214359 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260793076577 0.242375264174 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905581345478 0.0925447433944 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673274468496 0.071462118173 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152388258691 0.151781067708 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507736528262 0.0609392437508 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 53.1260098522 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 11.5310837438 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.67 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.