The importance of parenting in children's behavior, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial effect of children actions has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on the responsibility of their parents in recent years. It can be agreed that children's conduct is parents' responsibility has some positive impacts, but some people claim that it has some negative impacts as well. This essay will elaborate how 1 and 2 and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why parents should assume their children's acts is significant, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that parents should make sure the safety and security of their son and daughters, so when they commit crimes there is a lack of education from their parents. For instance, some parents do not punishments their children when they have stolen something from a grocery shop. Irresponsibility and lack of education from parents, therefore, can play a vital role for young people actions.
Nevertheless, there remain some drawbacks which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of judging parents from their kids' acts, but the most alarming one lies in the fact that teenagers should be responsible for their conduct and they have to learn the consequences of their actions. As an illustration, when a young person commits crime that person should do community work, so doing that he or she will understand that criminal actions have legal consequences. Punishing children for their acts, hence, can play a vital role to understand that personal actions have consequences in society.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the impact of being responsible for their children' behavior is prominent, although it has some drawbacks that should be well handled.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 5.94088669951 252% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 20.9802955665 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2474916388 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88760690211 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52508361204 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 462.6 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.7840389162 50.4703680194 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.636363636 104.977214359 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1818181818 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 7.25397266985 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238751790601 0.242375264174 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101218897612 0.0925447433944 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548622441491 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156444290494 0.151781067708 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353226859773 0.0609392437508 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.1260098522 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.9458128079 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.