Parents should be held legally responsible for children’s acts. what is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of parental responsibility toward acts of their children and its corresponding legal impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of being legally responsible is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the legal responsibilities of parents for children’s behavior can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, parental legal responsibility for children’s actions can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that any crime prevention, as well as having a gifted child, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered some irresponsibility drawbacks. Thus, beneficial ramifications of being responsible and encouraging children apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of educational issues, parents being legally responsible for their children’s acts might increase the consequences of disobedience. Moreover, fundamental aspects of juvenile delinquencies relate to this reality that the demerits of being neglected pertain to no parents’ attention. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of violent acts is correlated negatively with having self-esteem. Hence, it is correct to presumed the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of having legally responsible parents for children’s behavior far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of increasing self-confidence prove the significance of any crime committed, but also pinpoint educational purposes implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 279.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 6.05734767025 5.00649968141 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.63573742259 2.71678728327 134% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623655913978 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8611291136 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.833333333 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352664479024 0.242375264174 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133188048885 0.0925447433944 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110408908142 0.071462118173 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222796215013 0.151781067708 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054735003354 0.0609392437508 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 12.6369458128 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.16 11.5310837438 157% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.72 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.