Parents should be held legally responsible for children’s acts. What is your opinion? done
Parents are the first mentor of their children. Some parents are talking in accord with the above statement while other parents believe that they don’t take account of their children’s attitude. This essay is going to deliver indispensable arguments before reaching a conclusion.
Parenting plays the focal role in children’s upbringing. To begin with the positive note, children absorb and imitate what they observe from their parents and surrounding. Further, they spend more time with their parents during childhood. So mostly they pick up language, culture and etiquettes/manners by observing their parents. If parents are having faith and good ways, their children will become more likely with vision in life and have good practices. For instance, after Thomas Alva Edison’s school teacher called him mentally ill, Edison’s mother hid the letter from the young inventor and homeschooled him so that he could reach his full potential.
In addition, responsible parenting encompasses not only taking care of children’s basic needs but also teaching social conduct and discipline to them. Furthermore, parents should take accountability for the damages caused by their children in the society. For example, the leading actor Jackie Chan had taken responsibility for his son’s drug use and express regret to the public on behalf of him by telling that he failed to be a good father.
To sum up, with the above points, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that parents are solely and legally held for the children’s act.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 242.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50826446281 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04934320065 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652892561983 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4697184794 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.538461538 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6153846154 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.25397266985 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317287302174 0.242375264174 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117111574045 0.0925447433944 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726247747029 0.071462118173 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207465238718 0.151781067708 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500930474155 0.0609392437508 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.94827586207 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.