People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently the phenomenon of the high priority of developing the public transportation systems or constructing new roads and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate among the populations. Although expanding the public transportation systems are beneficial as it is regarded by the substantial number of individuals both constructive and positive, others hold opponents views based on building new roads. I am inclined to believe that public transportation systems are quite beneficial as they could develop some brilliant aspects for their adherents.
From a social standpoint, there are several reasons why developing and expanding the public transportation systems is advantageous. These benefits are rooted in the fact of development. From my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered these merits. Firstly, utilizing the public transport systems has a straight influence on diminishing the air and sound pollution which have some catastrophic impacts on health. Furthermore, public transportation systems are cheaper and more convenient to use. These systems have the strong potential to decline the traffic conguctions.
On the one hand, there is no doubt, the idea of building new roads instead of expanding the publuc transportation systems has some advocates. They concentrate on the convenient circumstances which exist in the individuals' cars. Moreover, they asserted that the public transportation systems are too crowded and occasionally hard to access.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the advantages of developing the public transportation systems are far more outweigh constructing new roads.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...enient circumstances which exist in the individuals cars. Moreover, they asserted that the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, moreover, so, while, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87109375 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37752862089 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5546875 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5860331076 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.615384615 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6923076923 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 7.25397266985 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1913285864 0.242375264174 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733519411081 0.0925447433944 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469393645501 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125114803245 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329276485274 0.0609392437508 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.