People naturally resist making changes in their lives. What kinds of problems can this cause? What solutions can you suggest?
Continuous transformation is a part of life in our world. It is true that humans don’t want to embrace changes in their personal or professional life. Changing something in our life has both benefits and drawbacks. This essay will discuss the issues caused due to this and remedies to overcome this psychological nature of human beings.
To begin with, resisting transformation will have some major adverse situations. Firstly, life would become monotonous if people go through the same experience on a regular basis. This will negatively affect people and finally they lose motivation. Secondly, one cannot progress in their professional career if they do not embrace change. To demonstrate, an interesting report published by Chase Corporation reveals that more than fifty percent of their employees in middle management level are reluctant to take up higher positions. Thus, we can see that opposing change will negatively impact both our personal and professional fronts.
So, are there any remedies to overcome this psychological barrier? The answer is yes. One of the solutions would be worth trying to change minor aspects in life such as cuisine or attire. This will give a hint of what it would be like to do things differently. Secondly, it will greatly help while making new choice by carefully evaluating it’s benefits and drawbacks. This will ensure that we will not end up putting something at risk. For example, I took a firm decision to take up a new employment after weighing pros and cons, which, gave me the opportunity to progress in my career.
In summary, it is quite natural for most people to be afraid of doing things differently which makes our lives uninteresting. However, by applying simple solutions, we can make it exciting and more meaningful.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, in summary, such as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 20.9802955665 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17525773196 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92300716772 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625429553265 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.6157635468 217% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 12.6551724138 150% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2760162174 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.2631578947 104.977214359 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3157894737 20.9669160288 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94736842105 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208434019517 0.242375264174 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542975231195 0.0925447433944 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03995131027 0.071462118173 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121506243237 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0169858093226 0.0609392437508 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 12.6369458128 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.1260098522 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.17 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.94827586207 60% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.