People should sometimes do things that they do not enjoy doing, such as learning a new language. Do you agree or disagree with the statement?
Recently, the phenomenon of doing enjoyable things and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that matters of hard-working people are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that agreeing with complicated statements can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, doing useful activities can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of responsible students, are crucial. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of enjoyable activities. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of performing efficient work are visible.
From a scientific point of view, performing trivial things can provide the community with negative impacts which are associated with the reality that the demerits of time-consuming matters are remarkable. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university described inefficient workers. Hence, predicted outcomes of learning a new language are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of performing valuable statements far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of useless learning prove the significance of enjoying harmful habits, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 222, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to prove'
Suggestion: to prove
...y do the advantages of useless learning prove the significance of enjoying harmful ha...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1334.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 225.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.92888888889 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30959249291 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0025152025 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.272727273 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4545454545 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246610039487 0.242375264174 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778689285572 0.0925447433944 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681651023864 0.071462118173 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130749643097 0.151781067708 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413375514197 0.0609392437508 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.11 11.5310837438 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.01 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.