Polygamy has increased widely in recent years. What solutions can you bring forward to decrease this issue?
Recently, the definition of the illiteracy in future has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what is the exact definition of illiteracy in future?". Whereas it is a widely held view that in future illiterate will be those who can not read, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, literacy is bound up inextricably with primitive education, which indicates it leads to both formal school and compulsory education. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between academic qualification and career as well as an exponential increase in income. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of learning skill is correlated positively with not only human capability but also inherited talent.
Within the realm of technology advancement, without the slightest doubt, computer skills attribute to new teaching method, in that it would come down to internet access, electronic books, and online searching. A salient example of such attribution is reading skill, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take illiteracy for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint non-proficient in digital world problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to limited knowledge, general information, and even insufficient skill. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of learning environment and improved educational system.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that in future illiterate will be those who do not learn. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 19, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73489932886 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20250284987 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 139.433497537 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674496644295 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1424688891 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.461538462 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0483647247828 0.242375264174 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0137296224112 0.0925447433944 15% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0266086193285 0.071462118173 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0295063289446 0.151781067708 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310858200345 0.0609392437508 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 55.0591133005 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.94827586207 181% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.