Professional workers like doctors, nurses and teachers make a greater contribution to society and so should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of professional workers making a greater contribution to society and so they should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities, and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the greater contribution of professional workers can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, the great contribution of doctors, nurses and teachers can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, the negativity of paying more to professional workers than sports and entertainment personalities might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of professional workers and their contribution to society which should be paid more than sport and entertainment personalities far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-19 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | yasamin.gharib62 | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-12 | alireza_esml@yahoo.com | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-12 | alireza_esml@yahoo.com | 80 | view |
| 2019-07-05 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 88
- Violence portrayed on TV and in the movies leads to an increase in crime in our society. People who watch violent movies are more likely to become criminals. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- Students should be required to stay in school until the age of eighteen. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience. 88
- In some countries around the world, voting is compulsory. Do you agree with the notion of compulsory voting? !f voting is compulsory in a democratic society, what are some conclusions we can draw about the nature of democracy? 88
- Television has two roles: to inform and entertain. Explain which of these roles you see as important. To what extent do you think that TV today performs these roles in an effective way? Support your point of view with observations or examples. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83275261324 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42253228644 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616724738676 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.2060444238 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.181818182 104.977214359 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0909090909 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329950603094 0.242375264174 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10700183953 0.0925447433944 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133003405737 0.071462118173 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183609548528 0.151781067708 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0990492595349 0.0609392437508 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 12.6369458128 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.83 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.59 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.