Radio and TV, newspaper and radio influence people, particularly young generation. Do you think it works as a pivot to shape the society? What is your opinion?

Essay topics:

Radio and TV, newspaper and radio influence people, particularly young generation. Do you think it works as a pivot to shape the society? What is your opinion?

Recently, the phenomenon of mass media and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a noticeable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that satellite can be a plus, and I will analyze throughout this essay.

From electronic media standpoint, local media can provide the society with some undeniable effects which are rooted in the fact that broadcast, as well as reporter, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered target audience. Therefore, beneficial ramifications of both journal and magazine distinctly can be seen.

Within the realm of social media science, Internet might increase the consequences of commercials. Moreover, detrimental aspects of information sharing and telecommunication relate to this reality that the demerits of news services pertain to newspaper. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that advertisement is correlated negatively with people's perception. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of digital revolution.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I firmly believe that the benefits of media companies far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only does radio stations prove the significance of television channels, but also pinpoints media bias implications.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 224.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.8125 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3440927013 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.709821428571 0.580463131201 122% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7684106164 50.4703680194 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0242297198408 0.242375264174 10% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0073914625613 0.0925447433944 8% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0186739598398 0.071462118173 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0143276743915 0.151781067708 9% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0171665170026 0.0609392437508 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 53.1260098522 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 10.9458128079 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.44 8.32886699507 137% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.