There are a lot of inventions nowadays, which invention do you think is more important in our day-to-day life. What are the benefits and detrimental effects of it?
Recently, the most important invention has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "which one is the most essential for today’s routine". Whereas it is a widely held that "smartphones are the most useful device", I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the economic standpoint, cellphones bound up inextricably with today’s modern lifestyle, which indicates they lead to sufficient use of both money and Time. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between high-tech gadgets, and economic growth as well as an exponential increase in people’s wellbeing. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, My empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of smartphones is correlated positively with not only economic progression but also improving individuals welfare.
Within the realm of psychological, without the slightest doubt, smartphones attribute to cyber crimes, in that it would come down to bullying, cheating, and children pornography. A salient example of such attribution is isolating people, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take depression for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint cyber addiction problems. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of mobile phones.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes " all's well that end's well", after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that smartphones are the most useful device for daily routine. However, with the benefit of the hindsight, we conceive that the more we research, the further we discover.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80935251799 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34085916985 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68345323741 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3861620744 50.4703680194 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.230769231 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0612093596331 0.242375264174 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0175883282381 0.0925447433944 19% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0299566542045 0.071462118173 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0365378616243 0.151781067708 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254683555666 0.0609392437508 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.87 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.