A recent trend in the entertainment world is to adapt classic works of literature for either TV or the movies. One argument is that this is to everyone’s benefit, as it introduces people to works they might otherwise never have experienced, while others say that turning books into movies not only cheapens the original, but is rarely done successfully. In your opinion, do works of literature translate effectively to the screen? Support your arguments with reasons and/or examples from your own experience and observations.
Literatures are becoming a prominent source for movies, and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. While some people think that altering books into a real show has multifarious benefits, others believe that it cheapens the novelty of books and literatures. This essay will discuss both views with an example.
To begin with, books and literatures are emerging as movies and TV shows, which is a very unique and innovative way of representation of written works. Many people in the world do not like to read, because of the sophistication within the book. For instance, scientists proved that human brain grasps knowledge from visual images much better than text. In addition, visual representation of a book makes it more interesting to watch and learn.
On the other hand, many demographics maintain that movie makers do not have the proper knowledge and technology to correctly interpret books into movies. These people have underestimated the level of sophistication in the books and literatures, because sometimes it is not possible to mimic books completely. For example, research done by MIT has suggested that some sections in books are not pleasurable for viewers, so, they should not be a part of movie. Moreover, directors and authors must to work side by side to proper translate text into images, which will be convenient of every age group to watch.
In conclusion, whether or not human have the capability to translate written work into sequence of image is still remain unsolved. In my opinion, everyone has different perspective about whether they like to read or watch.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-07 | Dinuka Dissanayaje | 88 | view |
| 2019-02-17 | ghimirra | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-08 | cur_zii | 77 | view |
| 2018-05-22 | ananddeepsingh | 11 | view |
- In the competition for consumerism, natural resources are fast depleting and run the risk of disappearing from the face of the Earth. What steps do you think governments and people should take to protect and preserve the natural resources? 85
- In some countries around the world, voting is compulsory. Do you agree with the notion of compulsory voting? If it is compulsory in a democratic society, what conclusions can we draw about ‘Nature of democracy?’ 77
- Some types of employment are more suitable for men and other types of employment are more appropriate for women. To what extent do you agree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience. 88
- Marketing strategy for some companies offers and discounts, for some it is reputation. Should consumer goods companies concentrate special discounts and offers to promote their products or they should focus on reputation? What do you think is more importa 80
- A recent trend in the entertainment world is to adapt classic works of literature for either TV or the movies. One argument is that this is to everyone’s benefit, as it introduces people to works they might otherwise never have experienced, while others 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 86, Rule ID: VERY_UNIQUE[1]
Message: Use simply 'unique'.
Suggestion: unique
...ging as movies and TV shows, which is a very unique and innovative way of representation of...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 490, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
... movie. Moreover, directors and authors must to work side by side to proper translate t...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 16, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ery age group to watch. In conclusion, whether or not human have the capability to translate ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16475095785 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9034967117 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613026819923 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4863193782 50.4703680194 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.692307692 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0769230769 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3076923077 7.25397266985 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162250049779 0.242375264174 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544122658394 0.0925447433944 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0268583904468 0.071462118173 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0983475833912 0.151781067708 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236285039685 0.0609392437508 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.