Recycling our waste is a big issue today. A lot of people feel that others are not recycling enough and that the government should make it a legal requirement. In your opinion, should laws be needed to ensure that people recycle their waste?
The issue of recycling the waste has become a matter of discussion for quit some years now, although some quarters of the societies are engaged in discussing this vital topic. Yet, there has been no substantial result. Nowadays, some people think that government should make a legal requirement of recycling the products, because many do not contribute in recycling their wastage. I will discuss some points to support this topic.
To begin with, if all population will recycle their wastage then they can protect their environment from increasing pollution, due to which they can also protect themselves and their new generations from dangerous diseases. Moreover, when they throw plastic and polythenes outside, they are not destroyed in the soil, which destroy the fertility of soil and pollute the air by burning. Furthermore, individuals can save their money by recycling.
On the other hand, some people claim that recycling of the products is wastage of time and energy, because they have not enough time for these works. Furthermore, people are living i9n cut throat era, where every want become successful, so that cannot pay attention towards their office work, when they think about recycling the produscts.
In conclusion, every coin has two sides, likewise, this topic also has mixed bag. But according to my opinion we caanot ignore advantages of recycling, instead of some disadvantages.So that government should take some measures for recycling.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 183, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: So
...ecycling, instead of some disadvantages.So that government should take some measur...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, likewise, moreover, so, then, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1233.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 232.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31465517241 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73045630744 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64224137931 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 1.71428571429 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.541082421 50.4703680194 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.090909091 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0909090909 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.54545454545 7.25397266985 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238168316223 0.242375264174 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804528786393 0.0925447433944 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950387583769 0.071462118173 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131525473524 0.151781067708 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073463015538 0.0609392437508 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.