Right amount of motivation and practice can teach one better than the training given to him in classrooms by teachers.
Recently, the phenomenon of motivation in individual’s success rate and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that motivation effects surpass the training courses which is provided by teachers, this issue is regarded thoroughly constructive and positive. I am inclined to believe that motivation plays a key role in individual’s success, and I will analyze this throughout this essay.
Firstly, motivation can act as a pushing factor and can provide the society with some noticeable effect which is rooted in the fact that educational achievements, as well as high career skills, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experiment, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment to investigate the likelihood of motivation in high management capability. Thus, it is quite clear why such an opinion has garnered support.
Within the realm of technological improvements, pushing factor for youngsters known as motivation can increase the consequences of attaining much more income in future. Moreover, the fundamental aspect of training without motivation relates to this reality that the demerit of low skilled employers pertains to lack of motivation. As a tangible example, a scientific research conducted at a prestigious university asserted that the downside of motivation and rewards correlates negatively with illiterate citizens. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of reward-seeking among people.
To conclude, while there are many compelling arguments on both sides, the benefits of providing the students with rewards far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only the advantages of having a great motivation prove the higher rate of success but also pinpoint higher income implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...sequences of attaining much more income in future. Moreover, the fundamental aspect of tr...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69029850746 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34691924854 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64552238806 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4168384876 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.083333333 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129240187572 0.242375264174 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0423450546618 0.0925447433944 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.033563218295 0.071462118173 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0708610244545 0.151781067708 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276474851988 0.0609392437508 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.8 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.