Should goverment build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport.
The topic of government should build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport has become a heated debate among societies. Although rich people assert that more roads are needed to help them, the others refute this proposal saying that it will only aggravate some serious issues in public. This essay will discuss why better public transport is always better than building more roads and reach a logical conclusion.
There are myriads of arguments on how public transport fortifies people in which the most preponderant one is that it will help in reducing the noise and air pollution in cities. Furthermore, an improved transport system means that all people have equal rights to travelling around different destinations. For instance, a study proved that the countries have advanced transport system are of 80% (civilized) than their counter peers. Apparently, better public transport is a precursor to meet a pollution-free environment.
Another pivotal aspect would be that it will accommodate more people in a bus thus no need for roads. Moreover, a good transport system will also improve people budget as they will spend less while going to the office, homes, or far destinations. For example, a recent survey revealed that Japan is working towards developing a train system in the coming years as this will help many people to travel. Hence, this is the reason many people gravitate towards this trend.
In conclusion, this essay discussed the better network of public transportation in terms of fewer pollution problems and improving people incomes. Therefore, in my opinion, governments should seriously consider improving public transport instead of making more roads as it will also boost the economy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 93, Rule ID: FEWER_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'less pollution'?
Suggestion: less pollution
...rk of public transportation in terms of fewer pollution problems and improving people incomes. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 280.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32142857143 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6939061049 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578571428571 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2622047173 50.4703680194 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.615384615 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3846153846 7.25397266985 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369403796088 0.242375264174 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143075773429 0.0925447433944 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.169834202778 0.071462118173 238% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252679729825 0.151781067708 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.181601167841 0.0609392437508 298% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 12.6369458128 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.