- Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport?
With the upsurge in the population the need for transportation has also augmented. Some people opine that government should construct more roads for the vehicles owner, while other hold an opposing view and tend to believe that public transport should be improved. My opinion, however, coincides with the latter notion. This essay will elaborate my views and thus will lead to a reasoned conclusion.
There are a deluge of arguments in favor of my stance, the most preponderant one stems from the fact that majority of population all over the world prefer public transport for traveling to work. Not only it reliable, but also cheap as compared own vehicle. For instance, a large part of population rely on average income, hence it is most suitable mean for them to travel. Therefore its quite clear that there is greater need to improve these networks.
Another key justification for upholding this notion is that, spending more budget on public transport will help in reducing the problem of traffic, which is of great concern in this present era. Not only it will encourage people to give least preference to private vehicle, but also will help in reducing pollution caused by them. As an illustration, if greater and more frequents routes are provided to public transport, then usage of other modes of transport will eventually reduced. Hence, It is significant that more heed should be given toward widening public networks by the regime.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the impact of improving public transport is prominent and advantages provided by it is too great to be ignored.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-17 | lovedeepkaur2000 | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Shruti gupta radhika | 85 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | manpreet9999 | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-09 | vahora juber | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | prabhdyal | 11 | view |
- - Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport? 77
- Cities are expanding and government should focus on building better network for public transport rather than building roads for vehicle. Do you agree or not? 72
- In underdeveloped countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said the opposite as well. 75
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 75
- whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'deluges'?
Suggestion: deluges
...o a reasoned conclusion. There are a deluge of arguments in favor of my stance, the...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... most suitable mean for them to travel. Therefore its quite clear that there is greater n...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'give the least'.
Suggestion: give the least
...a. Not only it will encourage people to give least preference to private vehicle, but also...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 478, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'reduce'
Suggestion: reduce
...ther modes of transport will eventually reduced. Hence, It is significant that more hee...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05576208178 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66534714432 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598513011152 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3139921572 50.4703680194 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.615384615 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.25397266985 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283047541658 0.242375264174 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879065842238 0.0925447433944 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107007038113 0.071462118173 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151870722085 0.151781067708 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807276437255 0.0609392437508 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.