Should governments allocate fund to which areas of concern? Climate change? Education? Public health? Explain your idea with examples.
Governments collect money from people who pay tax, in exchange, governments allocate funds to the areas that need the money the most. There are several areas, such as climate change, education and public health that needs most of these funds. The discussion of which areas should government allocate funds had sparked a heated debate. Although contested by some that government should allocate funds to climate change, others believe that education is more important for the future generation. In my opinion, I am inclined to believe that the funds should be allocate to public health and education first due to social and health reasons.
To begin with, education plays an important role in the development of an individual as well as the society, which ultimately impacts the development of a nation. Increased funds in education can empowers individual to chase their dreams and pursue higher education. Research found that countries with more funds in education have more civilised citizens who stand up for their thoughts and activities they are up to. Therefore, education promotes the development of countries which worth government invest funds to.
On the other hand, it is impossible to deny the importance of having mentally and physically healthy individuals in a nation. investing more funds in medical research, development of vaccine, public health insurance contributes to longer life expectancy and healthier individuals. For instance, United States had increased its funds in health-related research which had reflected on the prevention of long-term disease and advanced medical treatment since. Hence, such funds make all people healthier.
In conclusion, it is government’s priority to invest funds in education and public health before solving the issue of climate change since both are the fundamental of a nation and impact its development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-15 | priyankavs23 | 88 | view |
- The life that a person has depends on the personality, to what extent do you agree? From your own experience and examples. 77
- University tuition fees are increasing Some argue that higher education should be made free To what extent do you agree 85
- The government should allocate more funding to teaching sciences rather than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress. To what extent do you agree? 78
- The life that a person has depends on the personality, to what extent do you agree? From your own experience and examples. 77
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples. 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 560, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'allocated'?
Suggestion: allocated
...ned to believe that the funds should be allocate to public health and education first du...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'empower'
Suggestion: empower
...ation. Increased funds in education can empowers individual to chase their dreams and pu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Investing
...ically healthy individuals in a nation. investing more funds in medical research, develop...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 5.75862068966 417% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50173010381 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91386875112 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539792387543 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 490.5 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8203234952 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.571428571 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0714285714 7.25397266985 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395646897443 0.242375264174 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139561559603 0.0925447433944 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0812542874743 0.071462118173 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231083667993 0.151781067708 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110652592923 0.0609392437508 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.