The development of society is marching towards a globalized world where government fund allocation is an essential foundation. It is undeniable that a lot of advantages stem from money allocation. I strongly agree that funds should allocate to education and public health can help society reap enormous benefits. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view by analyzing the argument in various perspectives.
From a social standpoint, social and health reasons can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that the economy, as well as advantages of a developed country, are inextricably bound up. For example, according to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered chasing a dream and higher education. Thus, the beneficial ramification of increased civilized citizens is remarkable.
From a scientific standpoint, advanced medical treatment can supply the community with positive impacts, which are related to the reality that the merits of longer life expectancy are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research was undertaken by an elite university that described the long term disease is correlated positively with medical research. Hence, predicted outcomes of fund allocation on public health and education are noticeable.
To conclude, I concede that government fund allocation plays an integral part in the overall development of the economy. I profoundly believe that the benefits of efficient fund allocation, not only do the advantages of the vaccine prove significance for public health insurance, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 5.75862068966 347% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60317460317 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14681288654 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3835945566 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.666666667 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 7.25397266985 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244046649732 0.242375264174 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857819006862 0.0925447433944 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845259440518 0.071462118173 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140568243962 0.151781067708 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558132297095 0.0609392437508 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.