Should govt focus on public transport or building roads?
it is irrefutable to say that, public transport, as well as building a road, has been an important project our government needs to focus on. This has been debatable and sparked controversy about whether the government should focus on public transport or building roads. most people say public transport has a great impact on our society while others opine that building roads is more important. The following paragraph will assert on both side and appropriate conclusions will be given.
To begin with, there are many reasons why the government should focus on public transport. For instance, in countries like Singapore and UK 85% of their modes of transportation is public transport. Be it on train or buses not only they can control the pollution but also it's for the benefits of the mother nature. Therefore, public transport plays a vital role in many countries.
On the other hand, many people tend to believe that building a road is more important. As an example, Japan government focuses more on road construction and building bridges in order for them to cross or travel to different areas in the city. Furthermore, most of their people tend to walk rather than to take public transport. As for them, walking would benefit them and it's their own way of exercising daily. As we all know people from their countries are more concerns with their health as for them, health is wealth.
To recapitulate, both public transport and the building of the road will benefit the people in different ways. As we all know, public transport and road need to come together to our better gains.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is irrefutable to say that, public tran...
^^
Line 1, column 271, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Most
... on public transport or building roads. most people say public transport has a great...
^^^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...they can control the pollution but also its for the benefits of the mother nature. ...
^^^
Line 5, column 373, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...or them, walking would benefit them and its their own way of exercising daily. As w...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, while, as for, for instance, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1330.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92592592593 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65357899477 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52962962963 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 388.8 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.57093596059 89% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.8713217062 50.4703680194 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.6666666667 104.977214359 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13333333333 7.25397266985 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438854447918 0.242375264174 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165844644512 0.0925447433944 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120059981282 0.071462118173 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295998355085 0.151781067708 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0939540809428 0.0609392437508 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 12.6369458128 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.1260098522 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.9458128079 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.5310837438 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.32886699507 89% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 55.0591133005 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.