Should library use digital gadgets to provide information on different topics Pros Cons

With the development of information technology, libraries are also computerized and digital devices have been introduced to make functions efficient. There are advantages and disadvantages of this digital infrastructure. This essay will discuss the convenience of modern computer based systems and difficulties faced by non-tech people during operations.

Digital devises help to run functions of libraries easier and faster with less number of staff. Library catalogues and book issuing processes are computerized and related activities such as calculating fines is happened through computers. Moreover, computerized catalogues are more efficient and saves time. Therefore, automation using digital technologies make the lives of library staff as well as users easier.

On the other hand, operations of digital devices are difficult for non-tech savvy people. They face difficulties while handling automated gadgets such as computer based library catalogues. Statistical data shows that 70% of library users are children and elderly adults. Hence, non-computer literate people face various difficulties while operating high tech devices.

In summary, usage of digital infrastructure increases efficiency and non-computer literate people face difficulties while using these systems. In my opinion, even if state of the art technologies are a hindrance to certain people, they should be trained to gain the maximum benefits of modern digital era in libraries as well.

Votes
Average: 9.3 (6 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 167, Rule ID: STATE_OF_THE_ART[1]
Message: Did you mean 'state-of-the-art'?
Suggestion: state-of-the-art
...g these systems. In my opinion, even if state of the art technologies are a hindrance to certain...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, in summary, such as, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 20.9802955665 33% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1267.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 211.0 242.827586207 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.00473933649 5.00649968141 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10648233128 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 139.433497537 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635071090047 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.57093596059 127% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5456943507 50.4703680194 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4615384615 104.977214359 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2307692308 20.9669160288 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.25397266985 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181970759515 0.242375264174 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652683589416 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458752071695 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111496902319 0.151781067708 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206981885296 0.0609392437508 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.4 53.1260098522 40% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.3 10.9458128079 131% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.22 11.5310837438 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.