Should library use digital gadgets to provide information on different topics? Pros & Cons
One of the most conspicuous trends in today's world is the colossal upsurge in technological encroachment in the modern libraries. As such, there are pros and cons to this trend, although I am of the opinion that the former outdo the latter. In this essay, I shall outline some of the merits and demerits of gather information in the library using digital gadgets.
There is a deluge of benefits which can be attributed to the involvement of the digital devices in the setting of the library. The most preponderant one is that it makes the browsing of required material easy and approachable. For example, instead of going through the physical catalogs and searching for the desired book, using a computer to search the required book can improve the efficiency of library usage. It hardly needs mention that library stands in good stead as far as using digital gadgets are concerned.
There are, however, some pitfalls that can easily overwhelm the potential benefits of using digital devices for libraries. The primary one stems from the fact that involvement of digital devices can ruin the point of using the library. Besides, all of the library users are not tech savvy, and it is hard for them to find the information they have been looking. For instance, according to the census data, 70 percent of library users are either children or older adults.
In the view of arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of using digital gadgets in collecting information from the library are too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... latter. In this essay, I shall outline some of the merits and demerits of gather informati...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...he point of using the library. Besides, all of the library users are not tech savvy, and i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, look, so, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1272.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93023255814 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62617994519 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 139.433497537 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523255813953 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 406.8 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.6232726411 50.4703680194 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.0 104.977214359 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.25397266985 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253705735726 0.242375264174 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917712579301 0.0925447433944 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697871406528 0.071462118173 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163177343637 0.151781067708 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281446398973 0.0609392437508 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 12.6369458128 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.