Although such topics, in all likelihood, never will yield a consensual agreement, a constructive dialogue on use of digital gadgets in library can lead to thought-provoking discussions. My view is that, irrespective of the numerous agruments that exist on either side, the library should use digital gadgets to provide different information. Through the course of this essay, I shall put forth of my points and calculations by considering both sides of the argument.
There are a number of arguments in favour of my viewpoint. Firstly, we need to change according to the today's world. This is because if we do not use use electronic gadgets the efficiency would be less and more time will waste on learning. For example, If you want to read new book either you need to carry always with you, if you are using mobile then no need to carry hard copy of the book. In conclusion, the aforementioned discussion constructively justifes my stance.
Another interesting point is that, students are using mobile excessively by the name of study. This is mainly due to the fact that digital gadgets are addition to society.. To quote an example, the research conducted by department of the American society also reflects on the similar line, and hence, the proposition is convincingly justified.
I see that, there is equally potential evidence to support the arguments I have provided, and hence, the my opinion is that the topic of the statement does reflect on the justification that is provided here.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'will' and 'yield'.
Suggestion: will never yield
...lthough such topics, in all likelihood, never will yield a consensual agreement, a constructive ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: use
...ays world. This is because if we do not use use electronic gadgets the efficiency would...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
... digital gadgets are addition to society.. To quote an example, the research condu...
^^
Line 7, column 102, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'my'?
Suggestion: the; my
...e arguments I have provided, and hence, the my opinion is that the topic of the statem...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, so, then, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1255.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 249.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04016064257 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03922412403 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598393574297 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6900628694 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.583333333 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.25397266985 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234935173682 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745247802164 0.0925447433944 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0989612440968 0.071462118173 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126160463588 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.085785350861 0.0609392437508 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.