Should schools provide organized activities for children after lessons end?
Recently, the phenomenon of providing organized activities for children and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that children being organized by schools can be a plus, and I analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, organizing school by providing activities can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my experience when I was a university student, I performed an academic research and I discovered current policies. Thus, both ramifications of common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, providing activities after lessons end might increase the consequence of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
T conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of schools being activated after lessons end far outweigh, not only due to the advantages of this unique phenomenon proves the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint the thorny issues’ potential implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 245.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79591836735 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26720353036 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665306122449 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.5073755007 50.4703680194 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.0 104.977214359 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 7.25397266985 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317588325067 0.242375264174 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102566240328 0.0925447433944 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110030250646 0.071462118173 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165334640248 0.151781067708 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037392376167 0.0609392437508 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 12.6369458128 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 53.1260098522 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.01 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.