The effect of late submission from university students, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of universities which deduct students has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on university learners in recent years. It can be agreed that penalizing students has some negative impacts, but some people claim that it has some solutions as well. This essay will elaborate why universities should deduct students and what the possible solutions to address this situation and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why universities penalize students who lately submit their assignments is significant, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that university students are in a learning process which requires responsibility and commitment that will help them with the real issues after graduating. For instance, during childhood naughty children are not allowed to eat candy after not following parent commands. Discipline, therefore, can play a vital role for students who are in learning process.
Approaches to deal with the problems of the consequences for late submission are numerous, but the most effective one, which is not impracticable and unattainable, but it is comprehensible and feasible, lies in the fact that university faculties should have email memos which notify coming academic duties. As an illustration, Google has develop an app, Google classroom, which has a calendar in which teachers and students can be aware of workshops and academic activities. Implementing reminders, hence, can play a vital role for students when submitting their work.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the impact of deducting students for delay submission is prominent, although it has some drawbacks that should be well handled.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 526, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...l role for students who are in learning process. Approaches to deal with the problem...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'developed'.
Suggestion: developed
... duties. As an illustration, Google has develop an app, Google classroom, which has a c...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 5.94088669951 286% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51724137931 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02308989822 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562068965517 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.4339494597 50.4703680194 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.454545455 104.977214359 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3636363636 20.9669160288 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403751733317 0.242375264174 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135948234777 0.0925447433944 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630098748949 0.071462118173 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226598479301 0.151781067708 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371234086767 0.0609392437508 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 12.6369458128 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.