As sites expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or experience to support.
The importance of governments creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of using public transportations has sparked controversy over the potential impact of this trend on the whole society in recent years. It can be agreed that creating better networks of public transportation plays a vital role, though it has drawbacks. This easy will elaborate on how public transportation can save energy and how roads give people more freedom, and thus lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why governments should create better networks of public transportation rather than build more roads, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that better public transportation networks can save more energy, which directly influences the environment of the world. As an illustration, research has invariably revealed that petrol usage rate in China has dramatically increased four times compared with 2018 after better networks of public transportation line have been used in Beijing. Therefore, better networks of public transportation should be created by governments.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that the government should be building more roads for vehicle owning population as there are innumerable reasons for that but the most salient one is that more roads give people more freedom to their schedules. For instance, 78% local people think that the diversity of roads in France gives them freedom. Thus, governments should be building more roads for their countries.
In conclusion, from what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the impact of governments creating better networks of public transportation is prominent, although building roads should not be overlooked.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61403508772 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09599369792 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543859649123 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 469.8 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.9821640663 50.4703680194 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.454545455 104.977214359 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9090909091 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419334715808 0.242375264174 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176193051423 0.0925447433944 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797212236455 0.071462118173 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255079475773 0.151781067708 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509403952687 0.0609392437508 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.