Space travel is fantastic these days, but there any many issues, such as environmental problems, that we should be focusing on. What are your views on the allocation of public funding?
The importance of the allocation of public funding, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of the allocation of public funding has sparked controversy over the potential impact of this trend on the whole society in recent years. It can be said that the allocation of public funding is important, though it has drawbacks. This essay will elaborate on how the global warming phenomenon will require public funding urgently and how space travel can contribute to people’s wellbeing, and thus lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why the public funding should be put on environmental problems, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that environmental problems cause the global warming phenomenon which directly threatens the quality of people’s lives. As an illustration, research has invariably revealed that sea levels have dramatically increased ten times compared with four years ago due to the global warming phenomenon. Furthermore, the global warming phenomenon could not only take some irreversible consequences for the earth but also is harmful to all creatures. Therefore, environmental problems require more public funding from the government.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that space travel is also significant for the public funding as there are innumerable reasons for that but the most salient one is that space travel has some experimental purposes. For instance, the government allocates public funding to make space travel in order to discover new planets to live on for future generations. Thus, the government should allocate more public funding to space travel.
In conclusion, from what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the impact of the allocation of public funding to environmental problems is prominent, although space travel should not be overlooked
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53020134228 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05127863981 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523489932886 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 509.4 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.9177152231 50.4703680194 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.333333333 104.977214359 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.25397266985 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297823834375 0.242375264174 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128535551437 0.0925447433944 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087233050677 0.071462118173 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202901057325 0.151781067708 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635253976914 0.0609392437508 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.